INTRODUCTION:

Legionella pneumophila is a negative Gram bacterium, opportunistic pathogen, which is the lead contributor to Legionnaires disease, a severe type of pneumonia, and the mild Pontiac fever. It grows in an array of natural and built (engineered) aquatic habitats, as well as in industrial water-based infrastructure, including cooling towers, hot water systems, and other types of a massive water distribution systems that promote its expansion and spread.

The dynamics of survival of L. pneumophila in such anthropogenic water systems are critical in limiting outbreak and also in ensuring that it does not cause a risk on the population. This review outlines the existing information on L. pneumophila persistence, growth patterns, and adaptive responses in the industrial water infrastructure in regards to the formation of biofilm matrix, interaction with the protozoan hosts, adaptation to environmental stresses, disinfection resistance^1,2.

Although the environmental factors around L. pneumophila in maintained water structures are increasingly becoming more familiar, there has been no comprehensive knowledge of how the issues surrounding environment, microbes, and hydraulics interact to maintain its resilience. The review serves as an endeavour to provide an overview of the present-day knowledge on the survival mechanisms of L. pneumophila in the industrial environment, focusing on biofilm matrix formation and protozoan-pathogen interactions, biocide resistance and environmental factors which impact these processes and provide a better-informed surveillance and interaction guidance³.

1. Industrial Water Systems Ecology and Distribution:

1.1. Rachel Therapies Prevalence in Anthropogenic water Environments: L. pneumophila grows well in artificial water systems where it thrives due to temperature, the presence of nutrients, and the availability of substrates on the surface water. Cooling towers, hot tubs, industrial cooling systems, and the hot water distribution system habitat are chosen singly, but are all favorable micro habitats in which L. pneumophila may grow. Bacteria tend to grow in these environments as complex ecological consortia in biofilm matrix and protozoan hosts¹. Monitoring shows that several industrial water systems remain contaminated and these are generally related to design deficiencies including stagnant zones, plumbing dead legs, and less than optimal hydraulic flow². Recent results of sample and results in an industrial park of Shanghai, he or she pointed out that circulating cooling towers recorded a high positive detection rate of L. pneumophila, and temperature and water chemistry index-temperature and water chemistry parameters-specially conductivity and chemical oxygen demand-were considered independent risk factors that affected the concentration of these bacteria³.

1.2. Seasonality and Spatial Variation: The seasonal patterns have a profound effect on the ecology of L. pneumophila with detectable patterns of frequency in warmer months in connection with the most favourable temperatures of growth (20-50°C). Water systems are also known to exhibit spatial heterogeneity, both in clustered areas within given pipelines, as well as locations within given cooling tower zones, which may be interpreted into the effects of hydraulic situations with either the development of biofilm matrix and protozoa hosts that may contribute to the persistence patterns of bacteria⁴. L. pneumophila can survive and repopulate particular niches despite disinfection practices showing the difficulty in eradication in large-scale water systems that environmental surveillance has proven⁵.

In addition to microbial persistence, L. pneumophila outbreaks lead to considerable health burdens to the populations. Long-term pulmonary complications of legionella, long-lasting hospitalizations, and mortality due to legionnaires are costly both in clinical and economic terms. These dangers are also comparatively intensified by the fact that the population is increasingly getting exposed to large-scale urban water systems. The knowledge of the environmental survival of L. pneumophila is therefore essential in more ways than just controlling the infection, lowering the cost of health care and safeguard the vulnerable groups^6,7.

2. Biofilm Matrix: Growth Matrix and a Niche of Protection:

2.1. Formation and Structure of Biofilm Matrix: Microbial communities, which are sustained in the presence of a surface inside water infrastructure as biofilm matrix, are embedded in a matrix surrounding and play a significant role in harbouring L. pneumophila. Biofilm matrix is normally multispecies and consist of bacteria, protozoa, and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that provide an environment that has improved retention of nutrients, communication between cells, and shielding to external norms. The biofilm matrix architecture in industrial water systems is perceived to be governed by nutrient supply, hydrodynamics and surface properties⁶. Studies using optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to determine that biofilm matrix roughness has a synergistic relationship with L. pneumophila adhesion, probably the reason being that there is greater surface area and micro-niches against shear stress⁷.

2.2. The Biofilm Matrix Situation aggravated by disinfection resistance: Biofilm matrix vastly decreases the effectiveness of common elements of disinfection like chlorine or sodium hypochlorite. Their physical barrier is their extracellular matrix, and it is spatially heterogeneous making it difficult to penetrate with a disinfectant. This only strengthens the resilience of L. pneumophila because there are developing strains which are resistant to heating or the use of chemicals as a method of elimination. Thus, the combination of the engineering solutions, periodic flushing of the systems and selective antimicrobial measures can be effective control strategy⁸.

3. Interaction with Protozoa and Intracellular lifestyle:

3.1. Protozoa-mediated survival and virulence: L. pneumophila grows in free living amoebae including free living protozoa like amoeba that acts as natural intracellular hosts in water. This association potentiates replication, survival, and resistance of bacteria to external stress agents such as disinfectants. The bacterium induces a replication vacuole upon hijacking the pathways of host cells through the Dot/Icm type IV secretion system protecting the organism as it undergoes multiplication. When it runs out of nutrients, it becomes motile and infectious greatly enhancing its virulence. In addition, the microbes present in protozoa such as symbionts or antagonistic bacteria also control L. pneumophila^9,10.

4. Molecular and Proteomic Grounds of Survival:

4.1. Biphasic Growth and Expression of Virulence Factors: The proteomic also discovered individual protein expression profiles which relate to the two stages of the biphasic lifecycle of L. pneumophila which are the exponential (E) and post exponential (PE). There are about 397 proteins with varying abundance with a majority being Dot/Icm secretion system effectors that are key towards the intracellular survival and interaction with the host. PE phase bacteria are more motile and cytotoxic and stress resistant, which creates an environment of persistence and infectivity¹¹. These results suggest a highly controlled gene regulatory system involving regulatory programs like LetA/LetS, RpoS and CsrA to monitor the transition between replicative and transmissivity states¹².

4.2. Viable but non-Cultivable State (VBNC): L. pneumophila is capable of resuming its life cycle by returning to metabolic activity and being unable to grow colonies on standard culture media in response to stressful conditions, perhaps starvation or impairing temperatures, and it can enter a VBNC state. This condition fortifies environmental survival and makes detection and control work difficult. Their public health importance is proven by the fact that cells are infectious following resuscitation by protozoan hosts, which is the reason why VBNC cells cannot be ignored. Molecular analyses emphasize that some proteins are persistently expressed in VBNC cells and retain crucial physiological functions that it takes to persist¹¹.

5. Persistence Factors also Depend on Environmental and Operative Aspects.

5.1. Heat / biocide Adaptation: The ecological success of L. pneumophila is characterized by numerous environmental and hydraulic conditions. Although section 1.1 presents the general pattern of habitat preferences, in this section the role of poor flow conditions including dead legs and stagnation areas is highlighted as providing niches where the growth of origins biofilm matrix occurs. It is also essential to maintain optimum temperatures of above 55°C and residual disinfectants, particularly in the nutrient rich systems. Continuous water quality (e.g. conductivity, COD, and residual chlorine) data would be integrated to provide practical information to minimize risks related to colonization^13,14.

6. Detection and Monitoring in Industrial Systems:

6.1. Culture and Molecular Methods: Selection culture in a selective media such as buffered charcoal yeast extract agar (BCYE) is still standard in detection of L. pneumophila but it might underestimate the viable counts because of the VBNC state and biofilm matrix- entrapped bacteria. The use of molecular methods and PCR-ELISA and flow cytometry with immunomagnetic separation increases the sensitivity and ability to detect the presence of the disease within hours as opposed to days. As an example, L. pneumophila SG1 DETECT Kit takes advantage of antibodies and flow cytometry to provide rapid quantification across the complex water matrix, which is superior as compared with the conventional culture in turn around and sensitivity^14,15.

New diagnostic modalities are being developed (such as isothermal amplification, such as LAMP (Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification), or CRISPR-based detection), providing faster and more sensitive alternatives to other tests., on biological specimens, e.g. T lymphocyte production. Although not widely used in the surveillance of Legionella to date, these tools are promising as on-site testing and outbreak prevention, especially in under-resourced or at-risk industrial areas^2,9.

6.2. Strategies of Environmental Surveillance: The extensive surveillance that involves water samples, temperature, and microbial determination is vital in early detection and control. Literature reiterates the importance of integrated models that would provide evidence-based prevention through the capture of biofilm matrix behaviour, the presence of protozoa, and hydraulics in the water system to make informed decisions on how to intervene⁵. Scheduling of flushing and maintenance that will prevent stagnation of water will avoid the loss of the effect of disinfectants and reduce chances of a pathogen amplifying².

7. Controlling Strategies and Issues:

7.1. Innovative and Eco-Friendly Approaches: Natural antimicrobial compounds including biosurfactants and antimicrobial peptides under development have anti-Legionella activity and could provide green alternatives to toxic chemical biocides. An equally promising option is the modulation of microbial consortia in order to support symbiotic or antagonistic species against L. pneumophila. These environmentally friendly strategies are to be assessed further on scalability and effectiveness in production chain^13,16.

Nevertheless, L. pneumophila can induce heat-shock proteins adaptations, causing survival even after the procedures of pasteurization or Superheat-and-Flush. This brings the requirement of regular system review and careful application of biocides so as to select against resistant types^12,6.

Table (1) sums up the important environmental conditions that determine the behaviour and survival of L. pneumophila in water system. The range of 20-50oC is optimal biological growth conditions and encouraging biofilm matrix growth. The presence of stagnant water will tend to promote the growth of biofilm matrix and the use of chlorine may be used as a control measure, but bacteria in biofilm matrix are more persistent. The flow dynamics in a hydraulic system dynamic influence the biofilm matrix structure and stability. The high infection rate achieved by protozoa gives the bacteria a safe enclave where it replicates itself intracellularly thereby having increased survival and virulence. Last, bacterial proliferation and high biofilm matrix occur with an abundant nutrient level^17,18.

Figure (1) represents the environmental life cycle of L. pneumophila at industrial water systems. It starts with the adherence of biofilm matrix to the surfaces of the water systems encouraged by the presence of nutrients and the adherence to the surfaces. Within these biofilm matrix L. pneumophila moves inside the protozoan host into amoeba hosts, where it protects itself and becomes more virulent¹⁹. The infectious forms of the bacteria are released upon breaking of the host cells and as a result spread travel through the water released in the form of aerosols not only through the cooling towers but to humans through inhalation. The given cycle highlights the survival tactics of the pathogen and the risk to the public health in case of uncontrolled water infrastructure^20,21.

Figure 1: Schematic of L. pneumophila life cycle in industrial water systems.

This life cycle underlines the crucial roles of biofilm matrix and protozoan hosts in the environmental persistence and transmissibility of L. pneumophila in engineered water systems^22,23.

Future Directions and Research Needs:

The next research directions should be searching of the molecular complexes between L. pneumophila and protist hosts in multispecies biofilm matrix, investigation of the microbial community engineering as control tool, real-time and high-resolution monitoring tools to be able to predict the risks in question. The multiple-expertise effort between microbiology, environmental engineering, and computational modelling will be requisite in realization of robust water systems with limited vulnerability to Legionella.

CONCLUSION:

Survival of Legionella pneumophila in industrial water infrastructure is thus complex, and includes considerable biofilm matrix formation, close relationships with protozoan species, flexible gene and protein regulation, and tolerance of environmental perturbations such as heat and biocides. These are adaptive mechanisms that make L. pneumophila survive in the face of strict control measures, which makes it challenging to control. Various environmental conditions, which depend on the interaction of hydraulic spectra and water chemistry, determine the distribution and risk of pathogens. Improvements in detection systems, combined surveillance are crucial to successful control and development of novel technologies in non-hazardous control methods promise to lead to sustainability in management. Research gaps that remain in the future are the molecular dynamics underlying development of resistance, how interactions amongst the microbial communities influence their persistence, and further refinement based on optimization of controls strategies to more complex industrial water systems.

Such a broad awareness highlights the need to have multidisciplinary strategies involving the field of microbiology, engineering, and environmental science to reduce the effect of L. pneumophila on human health based in industrial water infrastructure. Reducing the vulnerabilities to public health of L. pneumophila needs a linked response in surveillance, system design, and microbial ecology, and the review offers a basis to this combination.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

The authors would like to thank University of Mosul for documenting this work.

REFERENCES:

1. Burlingame GA, Bartrand TA. Laying the groundwork for a Legionella pneumophila risk management program for public drinking water systems. J Water Health. 2024; 22(12): 2385-2397. doi: 10.2166/wh.2024.476.

2. Viasus D, Gaia V, Manzur-Barbur C, Carratalà J. Legionnaires' Disease: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment. Infect Dis Ther. 2022; 11(3): 973-986. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00635-7.

3. La Sorda M, Palucci I, Natalini D, Fillo S, Giordani F, and Paglione F. Case report: First report of Legionella pneumophila and Bordetella bronchiseptica coinfection in an immunocompromised patient. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 22; 11: 1470567. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1470567.

4. Wang H, Edwards M, Falkinham JO 3rd, Pruden A. Molecular survey of the occurrence of Legionella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and amoeba hosts in two chloraminated drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78(17): 6285-94. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01492-12.

5. Zhang C, Struewing I, Mistry JH, Wahman DG, Pressman J, Lu J. Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in full-scale chloraminated municipal drinking water distribution systems. Water Res. 2021 Oct 15; 205: 117571. doi: 10.1016/ j.watres.2021.117571.

6. Caicedo C, Rosenwinkel KH, Exner M, Verstraete W, Suchenwirth R, and Hartemann P. Legionella occurrence in municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants and risks of reclaimed wastewater reuse: Review. Water Res. 2019 Feb 1; 149: 21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.080.

7. Delafont V, Brouke A, Bouchon D, Moulin L, Héchard Y. Microbiome of free-living amoebae isolated from drinking water. Water Res. 2013; 47(19): 6958-65. doi: 10.1016/ j.watres.2013.07.047.

8. Fisman DN, Lim S, Wellenius GA, Johnson C, Britz P, and Gaskins M, et al. It's not the heat, it's the humidity: wet weather increases legionellosis risk in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area. J Infect Dis. 2005; 192(12): 2066-73. doi: 10.1086/498248.

9. Gleason JA, Newby R, Gaynor JJ, Lee LH, Chu T, and Bliese AD, et al. Legionella monitoring results by water quality characteristics in a large public water system. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023; 30(19): 55974-55988. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26198-9.

10. Lu J, Struewing I, Yelton S, Ashbolt N. Molecular survey of occurrence and quantity of Legionella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and amoeba hosts in municipal drinking water storage tank sediments. J Appl Microbiol. 2015; 119(1): 278-88. doi: 10.1111/jam.12831.

11. Martin RL, Harrison K, Proctor CR, Martin A, Williams K, and Pruden A, et al. Chlorine Disinfection of Legionella spp., L. pneumophila, and Acanthamoeba under Warm Water Premise Plumbing Conditions. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(9): 1452. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091452.

12. Gleason JA, Cohn PD. A review of legionnaires' disease and public water systems - Scientific considerations, uncertainties and recommendations. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022; 240: 113906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113906.

13. Völker S, Schreiber C, Kistemann T. Modelling characteristics to predict Legionella contamination risk - Surveillance of drinking water plumbing systems and identification of risk areas. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016; 219(1): 101-9. doi: 10.1016/ j.ijheh.2015.09.007.

14. Cohn PD, Gleason JA, Rudowski E, Tsai SM, Genese CA, Fagliano JA. Community outbreak of legionellosis and an environmental investigation into a community water system. Epidemiology and Infection. 2015; 143(6): 1322-1331. doi:10.1017/S0950268814001964.

15. Buultjens AH, Chua KYL, Baines SL, Kwong J, Gao W, and Cutcher Z, et al. High-performance Legionella pneumophila source attribution using genomics-based machine learning classification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017; 83(21): e01482-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01482-17. Print 2017 Nov 1.

16. Lombardi A, Borriello T, De Rosa E, Di Duca F, Sorrentino M, and Torre I, et al. Environmental Monitoring of Legionella in Hospitals in the Campania Region: A 5-Year Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(8): 5526. doi: 10.3390/ ijerph20085526.

17. Dawood A. Using Remdesivir and Dexamethasone for Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Shortens the patient's stay in the Hospital. Asi J Pharm Res. 2021; 11(2): 138-0. doi: 10.52711/2231-5691.2021.00026.

18. Anima Biswas, Divya Pujari, Manisha Masih, Arin Bhattacharya. Anti-Microbial Evaluation of Newly Synthesized Hetero-Aryl Thiazole Derivatives. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2025; 18(4): 246-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-4150.2025.00038.

19. Dawood A, and Jasim B. The CRISPR Genome Editing Process is an Effective Advancement of Short-Term Cancer Treatment. Res J Pha Dos Fo Tech. 2021; 13(1): 54-56. doi: 10.5958/0975-4377.2021.00009.4.

20. Keke M, Nnanwube I, Onukwuli O. Overvew of Boleachng. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 2023. https:// doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i2884.

21. Sayqal A, Ahmed OB. Advances in Heavy Metal Bioremediation: An Overview. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. 2021. https:// doi.org/10.1155/2021/1609149.

22. Dawood A. Reasons for discontinuing the use of Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of the Novel Coronavirus. Asi J Pharm Ana. 2021; 11(2): 179-0. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2021.00030.

23. Alhiti LS, Hamid E, Abdullah FH. Green Methods for Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis: Properties, Characterization, and Diverse Applications Review Article. Humanitarian and Natural Sciences Journal. 2025. https://doi.org/10.53796/hnsj63/12.

Received on 19.09.2025 Revised on 04.10.2025

Accepted on 17.10.2025 Published on 03.11.2025

Available online from November 12, 2025

A and V Pub J. of Nursing and Medical Res. 2025;4(4):116-120.

DOI: 10.52711/jnmr.2025.26

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.

Factor	Effect on L. pneumophila	Reference
Temperature (20–50°C)	Optimal growth; promotes biofilm matrix formation	1
Water Stagnation	Enhances biofilm matrix maturation and colonization	2
Disinfectant Residual (Chlorine)	Reduces bacterial counts; resistance within biofilm matrix	8
Hydraulic Flow	Influences biofilm matrix roughness, affects adhesion/detachment	7
Presence of Protozoa	Intracellular replication niche; enhances virulence	9
Nutrient Levels	Facilitates biofilm matrix growth and bacterial proliferation	3